14 April 2005

allow me to brag...

wahaha... look at what i got for my personal paper? the one which i rushed out in one day... it only counts for 20% of the final grade.. but still...

 Criteria

 

 Poor

 

0-19 percent

 

 Adequate

 

20-22 percent

 

 Exemplary

 

23-25 percent

 

Comments

 

 

Content

 

It was unclear as to how the content related to the overall field of project management.

 

The content was generally relevant, but was somewhat unclear or confusing at times.

 

The content was clear and useful. The writer gave a convincing justification as to how the content is relevant. The writer had a strong grasp of the material.

 

25 points – appropriate to project management

 

 

Organization

 

The paper was poorly organized. It was hard to follow the ideas of the writer.

 

The paper followed a logical sequence. Readers had a good grasp of how the topics fit together.

 

The writer’s organization was obvious, well managed, and logically sequenced. A strong conclusion was provided.

 

25 points – organization is a major factor in the success of the paper… the paper is logically organized, and the sections are introduced at the beginning.

 

 

Critical analysis

 

It is apparent that the writer did little more than rewrite other people’s ideas.

 

The writer was able to reflect on the content as to how it relates to the field of project management. Points of agreement, disagreement, and usefulness were detailed.

 

The writer’s introspection of the content, with his or her own life, career goals, and field of project management, demonstrated a deep level of content acquisition.

 

21 points - I like the way you described individual components in the section, “Communication with Project Team” – following this approach would be nice for each section – provides a better idea of the strategy you have in mind.

 

 

Writing ability

 

The writing ability of the author is suspect. Numerous grammatical errors were present. The report did not follow the rules of technical writing.

 

Although most of the report was well written, a few grammar and technical writing errors were present.

 

The report was clear and concise. Technical writing rules were followed.

 

25 points – very well written.

 

Total

 

 

 

 

96 points
An excellent paper.

 

ahem...

i feel damn bloody smart now. haha.. wait ah.. me go probe around and ask what my other groupmates got. if they all got full marks, then I shall go dig a hole, and bury myself. but then .. for one night's effort.. heck lah... i think i did well. gives self a pat on the back...

ok.. i didn't do the work I'd brought home to do... therefore, I shall.. go to bed. tmr is another day....

No comments: